This
week’s reading I found to be a very interesting study of social construction in
Jamaican culture, gender and class (and more specifically between Informal commercial
importers). Ulysses analyzes the “limits of local definitions of identities and
how these affect individuals who exist inside between or outside the borders of
instinctions”15.
Chapter 1 focuses on the history of black woman in
comparison to European white women. Thus perpetuating social hierarchies among
races and creating class divisions. The idea of white purity with womanhood
took away femininity from black women. “Color viewed as a manifestation of status
and became a primary index of a person’s worth”35. Ulysses argues that being
skin complexion emerged as a visible form of capital. In addition she further
insist that appearance was also a visible marker of capital. Lastly she goes on
to explore the stereotypes placed on ICIs being perceived as rude gals (bad
women, rough, in your face, rumored to be prostitutes and lesbian and denied
femininity).
In the following Ulysses focuses on the transition from higgler
to commercial importing, which she explains is caused by shortages and removal
of merchandises from shelves to exportation of goods for foreign exchange.
Then
next couple of chapters I found most interesting, as Ulysses shares her
personal experiences living in Jamaica and her interactions with locals and ICI’s.
as her focus within her program was to unpack local meanings of color, we see
how skin complexion plays a major role in how locals in Jamaica view each
other. Lower class people see light (white) as an important category to class, whereas
middle/upper class don’t arguably see the same. One comparison to US is Jamaicans
insistence on migration to the US as better life, similar to black migration
from the south to the north for economic freedom and liberty. She also states that she personally
experienced “afrophobia”(black women being too black) of black women
hairstyles. I can personally relate to this, because my natural hair texture
isn’t deemed representable in profession settings and many have made me aware
of this. And in conclusion for today’s reading, we see more about the work
about ICIs and their (In)visibility in their country. Because of the stigma of
ICIs many confront and “respond to socio economic and political structures
differently” 136.
No comments:
Post a Comment